瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于中年患者行胃肠道内镜检查的比较:一项前瞻性、随机对照研究

ed and randomly divided into a RT group and a propofol group. Alfentanil 5 μg/kg was used for analgesia in both groups. The RT group was given remimazolam tosilate 0.15 mg/kg with supplemental doses of 0.05 mg/kg as need, while the propofol group was given propofol 1.5 mg/kg with supplemental doses of 0.5 mg/kg. The supplemental doses were determined by the modified observational alertness/sedation assessment (MOAA/S) score and the patients' body movements. Sedative effects, such as the time to loss of consciousness (LOC) (MOAA/S score ≤ 1), successful sedation in one dose, number of supplemental doses after successful induction, and recovery time, were evaluated. Sedation-related side effects, such as injection pain, haemodynamic events and respiratory depression, were also noted. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest, remedial analgesics, and dizziness or headache were recorded. In addition, patients' satisfaction and physician's satisfaction of the procedure were compared between the two groups.

Results: Data from 77 patients were analysed. The success rate of sedation in both groups was 100%. The time to LOC (MOAA/S score ≤ 1) in the RT group was longer than that in the propofol group (20.7 ± 6.1s vs. 13.2 ± 5.2s, P

Conclusions:Compared with propofol, RT can be safely and effectively used for gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation in elderly patients, and the incidence of sedation-related adverse reactions, especially haemodynamic events and respiratory depression, is lower. When RT is used, the number of supplemental doses after successful induction may increase slightly.

任何理由通告：

本微信公众平台所刊出原创或刊发概要不代表鲍尔新闻网站的看法或立场。文中所包括药物使用、性疾病诊疗等概要可供法医学人士参考。

本文刊发自其他网站，不代表健康两界看法和立场。如有概要和图片的著作权对此，请立刻联系我们（邮箱：guikequan@hmkx.cn）

。

广州肿瘤医院哪家正规
重庆妇科检查
吉林男科检查哪家医院好
小孩子厌食不吃饭怎么办
上海看白癜风什么医院最好
钇90
钇90微球大约费用
夏季感冒老咳嗽吃什么治疗好的快
钇90微球注射液
钇90选择性内放射治疗肝癌怎么样